>>861
>Not saying telegram is any better, but consider anything a honeypot and do research.
Any better is a understatement, telegram has no e2ee, unless your in a special mode nobody uses which has a homegrown less reviewed algorithm. You might as well hand your data over to discord or whatsapp.
In comparison, signal even has online status e2ee, even if claims like not storing messages and such were bullshit, they can not access the message contents, or in groupchats show who was the sender of a message and who the participants are. The coin is irrelevant attempt at making money which nobody will use, who even sends funds over messages.
It's all about your threat model, signal isn't meant to hide illicit shit of course, but for communicating with those who know your phone number? It's a great WhatsApp replacement.
Furthermore, there's no evidence of the feds cracking signal, while telegram hands over data on many occasions, and still shows on their FAQ that they supposedly don't. In anything but secret chats on telegram (which glow), you have about the same security as discord. In fact, telegram storing decryption keys on their server along with all contents and metadata is the same trick WhatsApp uses to claim their secure while spying on you.
Also the same algorithm in signal is adapted for XMPP under OMEMO and is successfully used to evade law enforcement surveillance by criminal organizations.
Not saying signal is perfect, but consider anything a honeypot and stop being a Russian shill for a honeypot.